Three Problems Learned People Had With the Copernican Model

1. If the Earth actually spun on an axis (as required in a heliocentric system to explain the diurnal motion of the sky), why didn’t objects fly off the spinning Earth?
2. If the Earth was in motion around the sun, why didn’t it leave behind the birds flying in the air?
3. If the Earth were actually on an orbit around the sun, why wasn’t a parallax effect observed? That is, as illustrated in the adjacent figure, stars should appear to change their position with the respect to the other background stars as the Earth moved about its orbit, because of viewing them from a different perspective (just as viewing an object first with one eye, and then the other, causes the apparent position of the object to change with respect to the background).

The first two objections were not valid because they represent an inadequate understanding of the physics of motion that would only be corrected in the 17th century. The third objection is valid, but failed to account for what we now know to be the enormous distances to the stars.

—excerpted from class notes on the University of Tennessee’s website.